CAPS Research issued a study result that ‘only’ 72% of companies offer supply management training within the first 12 months after hiring a new employee. The commentary implies this is a problem; but is it?

I have just spent two hours reading about trust and governance, the need for agile projects, the importance of collaboration. I’ve also been answering questions on how parties can best maintain alignment over a multi-year agreement and the role of optimism in ensuring success.

It’s great news that impact investment continues to grow, with latest estimates published by the Financial Times (April 1st, 2019) showing fund values are now more than $500bn.

‘Commercial Innovation’ is increasingly recognized as a critical discipline for business survival and the delivery of value. Back in the 1940's, Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Schumpeter made the observation that to achieve success, technical invention must be accompanied - sometimes even led - by commercial innovation.

There is compelling data from a number of sources indicating the scale of invoicing error in business.

Today, I’m feeling surprised. And a little disappointed. I thought that progress was happening at a greater pace than it is. The fact it is not is bad news for the commercial community and its ability to innovate.

There’s a lot of conversation about building commercial competence within organizations. Sometimes it is referred to as ‘business acumen’. The reason it is so important is that decisions need to be made faster, but they must take account of risks. So there is growing investment in programs that help the workforce operate with better judgment.

In recent years, the UK Government has shown tremendous ambition in its efforts to transform the delivery of public services. Today, it offers a salutary tale illustrating the importance of ensuring that vision is tempered by an understanding of reality.

Much has been written about the future of the legal profession, in particular suggesting that automation will replace many of today’s lawyers. I think there can be little doubt that a large number of legal activities will indeed be automated. The question of how many legal jobs are eliminated rather depends on their readiness to adapt.